Some time ago I was wondering why the large Finnish retail
shops like the S-group, Kesko and Stockmann do not have a web presence, why
they do not have a web shop. Now, a few
years later, all have established some sort of web presence (e.g. http://www.kesko.fi/fi/Kaupat-ja-palvelut/K-ryhman-kaupat/verkkokaupat/ and http://www.s-kanava.fi/web/vk/en/asiakasomistajalle).
The latest is the S-group and you can see their web shop advertisements when
visiting the local Prisma supermarket.
The reason for the rush into establishing a web shop and a
web presence is simple: customers are on-line and ready to buy. Not having a
web presence means a sure risk of losing market share.
The retail shops were late in establishing their web shops
because their business logic was built around the local community and on the
logic of securing the best physical presence, in practice an intersection of
major roads, to build a physical store. The retail shops had focused on
physical intersections and forgotten the virtual intersections. Now they are
learning how to conduct an online business and they are learning that
underlying business principles and structures will be questioned by the
customer. The customer drives their business.
In a sense universities are similar to retail shops.
Universities are built around the local community to serve the knowledge needs
of the local population. Education in Finland is free. It is not the customer –
the student – who brings in the money. It is the government who pays for the
tuition. In this sense Universities are different to retail shops. However
Universities should pay attention and note that students are online and that they
are also learning online. The Finnish retail stores were late going online. The
Finnish universities will be slower. Hopefully they will not be too late in
creating an online presence.
Internet i.e. online business is different to physical
business. Internet based business models have four interesting characteristics:
search engines are key, tools are given to the user to enable interaction, one
should focus on building a community and the business model is scalable.
An online university could be compared to the hotels.com
application. It is easy to find a hotel room anywhere in the world. It should
be as easy to search for an online course starting within a single university
and then build to leverage interuniversity relationships. One should give the
students tools to openly comment and recommend the course to other students.
Why not, while at it, also give the alumni and industry members interactive
Internet based tools to comment and suggest content and areas of future
development for the course. In Finland
tax payers are paying for the tuition. Following the principles of open data,
tax payer financed content should be available to all – and not just the
students in class. Like in many Internet business models, the lectures could be
open to all in the online community and personal (possibly also online)
feedback plus discussion, course grading’s, certificates etc. to those who have
paid for the course or are enrolled as students.
It is interesting that the Internet was born in university
related research environments, but the universities are among the last to
notice the Internet´s potential in changing their business model and their
governance structures.
Ei kommentteja:
Lähetä kommentti